As the test suite is intended to run over loopback interfce, use
loopback address and skip configuration of other addresses.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lubos <robert.lubos@nordicsemi.no>
Add a bunch of missing "zephyr/" prefixes to #include statements in
various test and test framework files.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabiobaltieri@google.com>
In order to bring consistency in-tree, migrate all tests to the new
prefix <zephyr/...>. Note that the conversion has been scripted, refer
to #45388 for more details.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Adjust the test thread priority so that the test / IP stack
has a chance to run and the test passes.
Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com>
Got several sanity failures with this information
Assertion failed at tests/net/socket/poll/src/main.c:76: \
test_poll: (tstamp >= 30U && tstamp <= 30 + FUZZ is false)
In one of the failed tests, the tstamp was 50. Dunno what is
wrong here but in order to proceed with this, increasing the
timeout temporarily. This commit can be removed if the root
cause for this timeout is figured out.
Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@linux.intel.com>
As written originally, the tests assumed that if k_uptime_get_32()
returns times in milliseconds, that it also has millisecond
resolution. That however doesn't have to be the case, and indeed,
default timer interrupt period used by Zephyr is 10ms, and so system
time is incremented in such units. So, instead of "<= 1" tests to
account for timing increment, use "<= FUZZ".
For blocking tests, increase the timeout from previously used 10ms,
so we can reliably tests delays under the conditions described.
Also, enable CONFIG_QEMU_TICKLESS_WORKAROUND. Most other
timing-related tests have this enabled, and it may affect
stability of QEMU testing too.
Fixes: #12994
Signed-off-by: Paul Sokolovsky <paul.sokolovsky@linaro.org>
Basic test for poll() behavior. UDP sockets are used for simplicity
so far (poll-related paths for UDP and TCP are similar, though later
adding TCP explicitly for full coverage may be useful).
Signed-off-by: Paul Sokolovsky <paul.sokolovsky@linaro.org>
