zephyr/tests/bluetooth/controller/mock_ctrl/src
Gerard Marull-Paretas 79e6b0e0f6 includes: prefer <zephyr/kernel.h> over <zephyr/zephyr.h>
As of today <zephyr/zephyr.h> is 100% equivalent to <zephyr/kernel.h>.
This patch proposes to then include <zephyr/kernel.h> instead of
<zephyr/zephyr.h> since it is more clear that you are including the
Kernel APIs and (probably) nothing else. <zephyr/zephyr.h> sounds like a
catch-all header that may be confusing. Most applications need to
include a bunch of other things to compile, e.g. driver headers or
subsystem headers like BT, logging, etc.

The idea of a catch-all header in Zephyr is probably not feasible
anyway. Reason is that Zephyr is not a library, like it could be for
example `libpython`. Zephyr provides many utilities nowadays: a kernel,
drivers, subsystems, etc and things will likely grow. A catch-all header
would be massive, difficult to keep up-to-date. It is also likely that
an application will only build a small subset. Note that subsystem-level
headers may use a catch-all approach to make things easier, though.

NOTE: This patch is **NOT** removing the header, just removing its usage
in-tree. I'd advocate for its deprecation (add a #warning on it), but I
understand many people will have concerns.

Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
2022-09-05 16:31:47 +02:00
..
ecb.c
kernel.c test: fix more legacy #include paths 2022-08-02 16:41:41 +01:00
ll_assert.c
ll.c test: fix more legacy #include paths 2022-08-02 16:41:41 +01:00
lll_clock.c
lll_conn.c
lll.c test: fix more legacy #include paths 2022-08-02 16:41:41 +01:00
mayfly.c
ticker.c
ull_central.c
ull_conn_iso.c includes: prefer <zephyr/kernel.h> over <zephyr/zephyr.h> 2022-09-05 16:31:47 +02:00
ull_peripheral_iso.c includes: prefer <zephyr/kernel.h> over <zephyr/zephyr.h> 2022-09-05 16:31:47 +02:00
ull_peripheral.c
ull_scan.c
ull.c
util.c include: add more missing zephyr/ prefixes 2022-05-27 15:20:27 -07:00