Update the logic in a corner case, when the target comparator value is
one cycle ahead of the counter value.
Experiments have shown, that `set_comparator(cyc + 1);` might be not
enough in that case, and we still may (rarely) miss the interrupt.
This could happen when the counter incremented its value after the `dt`
variable was set. As we should set the comparator value two cycles
ahead to be on the safe side, increment the target comparator value
by 2 instead of 1.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lubos <robert.lubos@nordicsemi.no>
9f34d17cc1