79e6b0e0f6
As of today <zephyr/zephyr.h> is 100% equivalent to <zephyr/kernel.h>. This patch proposes to then include <zephyr/kernel.h> instead of <zephyr/zephyr.h> since it is more clear that you are including the Kernel APIs and (probably) nothing else. <zephyr/zephyr.h> sounds like a catch-all header that may be confusing. Most applications need to include a bunch of other things to compile, e.g. driver headers or subsystem headers like BT, logging, etc. The idea of a catch-all header in Zephyr is probably not feasible anyway. Reason is that Zephyr is not a library, like it could be for example `libpython`. Zephyr provides many utilities nowadays: a kernel, drivers, subsystems, etc and things will likely grow. A catch-all header would be massive, difficult to keep up-to-date. It is also likely that an application will only build a small subset. Note that subsystem-level headers may use a catch-all approach to make things easier, though. NOTE: This patch is **NOT** removing the header, just removing its usage in-tree. I'd advocate for its deprecation (add a #warning on it), but I understand many people will have concerns. Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| src | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| prj_arm_fpu_sharing.conf | ||
| prj_armv8m_mpu_stack_guard.conf | ||
| prj.conf | ||
| protection_no_userspace.conf | ||
| README | ||
| sentinel.conf | ||
| testcase.yaml | ||
This test case verifies that kernel fatal error handling works correctly. If a thread causes a CPU exception, and it is not in an ISR or "essential" thread, the thread gets aborted and the rest of the system executes normally.