zephyr/samples/microkernel/apps/philosophers
Juan Manuel Cruz 4f076467fd Kbuild: Micro and nano kernel apps samples.
This commit adds the parameters to the Makefile.kbuild for
micro and nano kernel apps samples.
This prepares the sample apps to be used by the sanity check.

Signed-off-by: Juan Manuel Cruz <juan.m.cruz.alcaraz@linux.intel.com>
Change-Id: I7636f0375493e12b4604f6fb6c4b6100d2c6604c
2016-02-05 20:14:07 -05:00
..
src Kbuild: Philosophers makefile fix. 2016-02-05 20:14:06 -05:00
Makefile Kbuild: Micro and nano kernel apps samples. 2016-02-05 20:14:07 -05:00
prj_arm.conf samples: remove explicit enabling of SW_ISR_TABLE/DYNAMIC 2016-02-05 20:13:45 -05:00
prj_x86.conf First commit 2015-04-10 16:44:37 -07:00
prj.vpf First commit 2015-04-10 16:44:37 -07:00
README.txt Remove references to Simics from README.txt files 2016-02-05 20:13:48 -05:00

Title:  philosopher

Description:

An implementation of a solution to the Dining Philosophers problem
(a classic multi-thread synchronization problem).  This particular
implementation demonstrates the usage of microkernel task groups,
Mutex APIs and timer drivers from multiple (6) tasks.

The philosopher always tries to get the lowest fork first (f1 then f2).
When done, he will give back the forks in the reverse order (f2 then f1).
If he gets two forks, he is EATING.  Otherwise, he is THINKING.

Each philosopher will randomly alternate between the EATING and THINKING
states.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Building and Running Project:

This microkernel project outputs to the console.  It can be built and executed
on QEMU as follows:

    make pristine
    make microkernel.qemu

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sample Output:

Philosopher 0 EATING
Philosopher 1 THINKING
Philosopher 2 THINKING
Philosopher 3 EATING
Philosopher 4 THINKING
Philosopher 5 THINKING








Demo Description
----------------
An implementation of a solution to the Dining Philosophers problem
(a classic multi-thread synchronization problem).  This particular
implementation demonstrates the usage of multiple (6) tasks
of differing priorities and the nanokernel semaphores and timers.