DEVICE_AND_API_INIT and DEVICE_DEFINE are identical except that
DEVICE_DEFINE adds a parameter providing the device pm control
function, while DEVICE_AND_API_INIT does not. This requires duplicate
implementations where if CONFIG_DEVICE_POWER_MANAGEMENT is enabled
then DEVICE_AND_API_INIT delegates to DEVICE_DEFINE with a dummy pm
control function, and if it is not enabled then DEVICE_DEFINE discards
the parameter and delegates to DEVICE_AND_API_INIT.
DEVICE_INIT is like DEVICE_AND_API_INIT but doesn't provide an API.
Clean this up by refactoring so that DEVICE_DEFINE is the core
implementation, providing with and without device power management
right next to each other where they can be compared and maintained.
Redefine DEVICE_INIT and DEVICE_AND_API_INIT delegate to
DEVICE_DEFINE.
Also remove duplicate code by extracting the variations due to
enabling device power management into macros.
Signed-off-by: Peter Bigot <peter.bigot@nordicsemi.no>
72ebf70543