033672114b
The current ENOSYS check code can proceed for a driver that hypothetically implements the on() but not the off() function of vice versa, which would result in a null pointer dereference. This would be a weird use case but Coverity catches the situation, no harm in changing the ENOSYS check to fail if the on/off is half implemented, so let's change it to do that. Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabiobaltieri@google.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| zephyr | ||