The _SYS_INIT_LEVEL* definitions were used to indicate the index entry
into the levels array defined in init.c (z_sys_init_run_level). init.c
uses this information internally, so there is no point in exposing this
in a public header. It has been replaced with an enum inside init.c. The
device shell was re-using the same defines to index its own array. This
is a fragile design, the shell needs to be responsible of its own data
indexing. A similar situation happened with some unit tests.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
We have cases where some devices needs to be initialized very early and
before c_start is call, i.e. to setup very early console or to setup
memory. Traditionally this would be hardcoded as part of the soc layer
and not using device model or the init levels.
This patch adds a new level ARCH, which will be called in early
architecture code and before we jump to the kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
As of today <zephyr/zephyr.h> is 100% equivalent to <zephyr/kernel.h>.
This patch proposes to then include <zephyr/kernel.h> instead of
<zephyr/zephyr.h> since it is more clear that you are including the
Kernel APIs and (probably) nothing else. <zephyr/zephyr.h> sounds like a
catch-all header that may be confusing. Most applications need to
include a bunch of other things to compile, e.g. driver headers or
subsystem headers like BT, logging, etc.
The idea of a catch-all header in Zephyr is probably not feasible
anyway. Reason is that Zephyr is not a library, like it could be for
example `libpython`. Zephyr provides many utilities nowadays: a kernel,
drivers, subsystems, etc and things will likely grow. A catch-all header
would be massive, difficult to keep up-to-date. It is also likely that
an application will only build a small subset. Note that subsystem-level
headers may use a catch-all approach to make things easier, though.
NOTE: This patch is **NOT** removing the header, just removing its usage
in-tree. I'd advocate for its deprecation (add a #warning on it), but I
understand many people will have concerns.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Add a bunch of missing "zephyr/" prefixes to #include statements in
various test and test framework files.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabiobaltieri@google.com>
In order to bring consistency in-tree, migrate all tests to the new
prefix <zephyr/...>. Note that the conversion has been scripted, refer
to #45388 for more details.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Extended test to validate following functionality:
- k_busy_wait
- k_timer
- irq_lock/irq_unlock
- k_cpu_idle
- SYS_INIT()
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Chruscinski <krzysztof.chruscinski@nordicsemi.no>
The comment in this test says that it cannot use ztest, as the latter
spawns some threads. However, still format the output in a way
compatible with ztest output, by using tc_util.h macros. This is
similar to a few other tests which can't use ztest library directly.
Signed-off-by: Paul Sokolovsky <paul.sokolovsky@linaro.org>
We are reporting success twice, once by calling macro directly, and once
by using ztest test_main().
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
This is a feature Ben added so you could use Zephyr's arch layer to
bootstrap things like bootloaders without sucking in the whole kernel.
And it's worked until now.
But we never had a test for it, and I just broke it with the scheduler
rework. Add a trivial test just to make sure this continues to link
and run. Longer term it would be nice to have some kind of size
metric here to guarantee that the feature stays lean and doesn't pull
in needless code.
Signed-off-by: Andy Ross <andrew.j.ross@intel.com>
