Now that the automation picks the right name automatically, there's no
need to edit it manually as part of the release process.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabiobaltieri@google.com>
RC releases clutter the release page, there's no reason for keeping them
after the release is done, filter them out from the workflow so they
don't get created in the first place..
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabiobaltieri@google.com>
Drop the process step to create zephyr- prefixed tags.
This has been done so that autogenerated release files have a sensible
name, but GitHub started to automatically prefix the project names to
release artifacts anyway using HTTP headers, which now results in file
named like: zephyr-zephyr-v3.2.0.tar.gz, so the extra tags are now
causing the opposite problem.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabiobaltieri@google.com>
Change the release process documentation to only use the overview of the
release notes for GitHub releases rather than the full file.
The current instructions of copying the full content are broken (the
file does not fit anyway and the formatting is incompatible) and result
in a cluttered page anyway (the UI is not really meant for long release
notes).
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabiobaltieri@google.com>
Do not use the merge window terminology which can be confusing and use
"development phase" and "stabilisation phase" instead.
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
