The documentation of "Kernel/Data Structures" incorrectly
states that 'all provided structures are uniformly unsynchronized;
access to them is not threadsafe by default'.
In reality, some of them are threadsafe and some are not.
This might discourage users from using threadsafe data structures
where applicable, or mislead users into adding unnecessary locks.
This proposal addresses the issue by specifying thread safety
for each provided data structure.
My assessment of thread safety is based purely on source code analysis;
hence an expert verification would be appreciated.
Signed-off-by: Vukan Turkulov <vukant@gmail.com>
Moves the rtio_ prefixed lockfree queues to sys alongside existing
mpsc/spsc pbuf, ringbuf, and similar queue-like data structures.
Signed-off-by: Tom Burdick <thomas.burdick@intel.com>
Move this section under the kernel and alongside other core and low
level features that are tied to the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
