As of today <zephyr/zephyr.h> is 100% equivalent to <zephyr/kernel.h>.
This patch proposes to then include <zephyr/kernel.h> instead of
<zephyr/zephyr.h> since it is more clear that you are including the
Kernel APIs and (probably) nothing else. <zephyr/zephyr.h> sounds like a
catch-all header that may be confusing. Most applications need to
include a bunch of other things to compile, e.g. driver headers or
subsystem headers like BT, logging, etc.
The idea of a catch-all header in Zephyr is probably not feasible
anyway. Reason is that Zephyr is not a library, like it could be for
example `libpython`. Zephyr provides many utilities nowadays: a kernel,
drivers, subsystems, etc and things will likely grow. A catch-all header
would be massive, difficult to keep up-to-date. It is also likely that
an application will only build a small subset. Note that subsystem-level
headers may use a catch-all approach to make things easier, though.
NOTE: This patch is **NOT** removing the header, just removing its usage
in-tree. I'd advocate for its deprecation (add a #warning on it), but I
understand many people will have concerns.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
It is frequent to find variable definitions like this:
```c
static const struct device *dev = DEVICE_DT_GET(...)
```
That is, module level variables that are statically initialized with a
device reference. Such value is, in most cases, never changed meaning
the variable can also be declared as const (immutable). This patch
constifies all such cases.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Add a polling sample for 3-Axis accelerometers.
This sample demonstrates how to data fetch and print to the console.
Signed-off-by: TOKITA Hiroshi <tokita.hiroshi@fujitsu.com>
