rand32.h does not make much sense, since the random subsystem
provides more APIs than just getting a random 32 bits value.
Rename it to random.h and get consistently with other
subsystems.
Signed-off-by: Flavio Ceolin <flavio.ceolin@intel.com>
As both C and C++ standards require applications running under an OS to
return 'int', adapt that for Zephyr to align with those standard. This also
eliminates errors when building with clang when not using -ffreestanding,
and reduces the need for compiler flags to silence warnings for both clang
and gcc.
Most of these changes were automated using coccinelle with the following
script:
@@
@@
- void
+ int
main(...) {
...
- return;
+ return 0;
...
}
Approximately 40 files had to be edited by hand as coccinelle was unable to
fix them.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Move runtime checks to use arch_num_cpus() and build checks
to use CONFIG_MP_MAX_NUM_CPUS. This is to allow runtime
determination of the number of CPUs in the future.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@intel.com>
As of today <zephyr/zephyr.h> is 100% equivalent to <zephyr/kernel.h>.
This patch proposes to then include <zephyr/kernel.h> instead of
<zephyr/zephyr.h> since it is more clear that you are including the
Kernel APIs and (probably) nothing else. <zephyr/zephyr.h> sounds like a
catch-all header that may be confusing. Most applications need to
include a bunch of other things to compile, e.g. driver headers or
subsystem headers like BT, logging, etc.
The idea of a catch-all header in Zephyr is probably not feasible
anyway. Reason is that Zephyr is not a library, like it could be for
example `libpython`. Zephyr provides many utilities nowadays: a kernel,
drivers, subsystems, etc and things will likely grow. A catch-all header
would be massive, difficult to keep up-to-date. It is also likely that
an application will only build a small subset. Note that subsystem-level
headers may use a catch-all approach to make things easier, though.
NOTE: This patch is **NOT** removing the header, just removing its usage
in-tree. I'd advocate for its deprecation (add a #warning on it), but I
understand many people will have concerns.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Following zephyr's style guideline, all if statements, including single
line statements shall have braces.
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
In order to bring consistency in-tree, migrate all samples to the use
the new prefix <zephyr/...>. Note that the conversion has been scripted:
```python
from pathlib import Path
import re
EXTENSIONS = ("c", "h", "cpp", "rst")
for p in Path(".").glob("samples/**/*"):
if not p.is_file() or p.suffix and p.suffix[1:] not in EXTENSIONS:
continue
content = ""
with open(p) as f:
for line in f:
m = re.match(r"^(.*)#include <(.*)>(.*)$", line)
if (m and
not m.group(2).startswith("zephyr/") and
(Path(".") / "include" / "zephyr" / m.group(2)).exists()):
content += (
m.group(1) +
"#include <zephyr/" + m.group(2) +">" +
m.group(3) + "\n"
)
else:
content += line
with open(p, "w") as f:
f.write(content)
```
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
As described in #42403, there was an issue with the existing crc16_ansi()
implementation, since it was not calculating the CRC-16-ANSI (aka
CRC-16-MODBUS). This is because the existing crc16() function only
supported non-reflected input and output (and the CRC-16-ANSI requires
reflection on both) and also it did not seem to support correctly inial
seeds different from 0x0000 (and, again, the CRC-16-ANSI requires 0xffff
as an initial seed).
This commit replaces the existing crc16() with a functional pair,
crc16() and crc16_reflect(), that also work with any poly, any initial seed
and allow to select whether reflection is performed.
It also adapts crc16_ansi() so that it actually returns the correct CRC.
Fixes#42403.
Signed-off-by: Carles Cufi <carles.cufi@nordicsemi.no>
smp and mpu are architecture specific samples and do not apply to
majority of support platforms, so move them to arch/.
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
