As of today <zephyr/zephyr.h> is 100% equivalent to <zephyr/kernel.h>.
This patch proposes to then include <zephyr/kernel.h> instead of
<zephyr/zephyr.h> since it is more clear that you are including the
Kernel APIs and (probably) nothing else. <zephyr/zephyr.h> sounds like a
catch-all header that may be confusing. Most applications need to
include a bunch of other things to compile, e.g. driver headers or
subsystem headers like BT, logging, etc.
The idea of a catch-all header in Zephyr is probably not feasible
anyway. Reason is that Zephyr is not a library, like it could be for
example `libpython`. Zephyr provides many utilities nowadays: a kernel,
drivers, subsystems, etc and things will likely grow. A catch-all header
would be massive, difficult to keep up-to-date. It is also likely that
an application will only build a small subset. Note that subsystem-level
headers may use a catch-all approach to make things easier, though.
NOTE: This patch is **NOT** removing the header, just removing its usage
in-tree. I'd advocate for its deprecation (add a #warning on it), but I
understand many people will have concerns.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
In order to bring consistency in-tree, migrate all samples to the use
the new prefix <zephyr/...>. Note that the conversion has been scripted:
```python
from pathlib import Path
import re
EXTENSIONS = ("c", "h", "cpp", "rst")
for p in Path(".").glob("samples/**/*"):
if not p.is_file() or p.suffix and p.suffix[1:] not in EXTENSIONS:
continue
content = ""
with open(p) as f:
for line in f:
m = re.match(r"^(.*)#include <(.*)>(.*)$", line)
if (m and
not m.group(2).startswith("zephyr/") and
(Path(".") / "include" / "zephyr" / m.group(2)).exists()):
content += (
m.group(1) +
"#include <zephyr/" + m.group(2) +">" +
m.group(3) + "\n"
)
else:
content += line
with open(p, "w") as f:
f.write(content)
```
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
* Use case of interest:
Some platforms are shipping in parallel to the internal FLASH some other
storage / external FLASH (usually a QSPI FLASH) that can be used to
execute (XIP) code from.
The content of this external FLASH can usually be written at flash time
using proper tools (see for example the case of the external FLASH on
the nRF5340DK that can be written at flash time using nrfjprog).
The external FLASH is a nice addition that is extremely useful when a
large application code doesn't entirely fit on the internal FLASH so
that we could want to move part of it in the auxiliary FLASH to XIP the
code from there.
* The problem:
Right now Zephyr doesn't have a formal and generic way to move at build
time part of the code to a different memory region.
* The current status:
Zephyr is indeed shipping a code_relocation feature but that doesn't
entirely match our needs.
When XIP is enabled, the code_relocation feature is used in Zephyr to
move the selected code (that is to copy text section, to initialize data
and zero bss) from FLASH to SRAM at run time and execute code from SRAM.
The relocation is done by a generated snippet of code that is
memcpy()-ing the right content to the destination region also using some
build-time generated portions of linker script to retrieve start and
destination addresses and regions.
* This patch:
This patch is leveraging the code_relocation code and adding a NOCOPY
feature. This feature is using the code_relocation feature to
dynamically build the linker script snippets but entirely skipping the
run-time code relocation so that the code can be XIP-ed from the
destination region.
* Example:
Let's say that we have a big file called `huge_file.c` that we want to
XIP from the external FLASH that is mapped in an EXTFLASH region.
In this case we should enable `CONFIG_XIP` and
`CONFIG_CODE_DATA_RELOCATION` and instruct cmake as follows:
zephyr_code_relocate(src/huge_file.c EXTFLASH_TEXT NOCOPY)
zephyr_code_relocate(src/huge_file.c SRAM_DATA)
this means that:
- The .text section of the `huge_file.c` must reside in the EXTFLASH
memory region and we do not need to copy the section there because we
are going to XIP it (and we assume that the file is going to be placed
in the external FLASH at flash time).
- The .data section of the `huge_file.c` must still reside in the SRAM
memory region.
* TODOs:
It's desirable to have the possibility to relocate libraries and
pre-build files instead of source code files.
Signed-off-by: Carlo Caione <ccaione@baylibre.com>
