This commit renames the `cortex_r` directory under the AArch32 to
`cortex_a_r`, in preparation for the AArch32 Cortex-A support.
The rationale for this renaming is that the Cortex-A and Cortex-R share
the same base design and the difference between them, other than the
MPU vs. MMU, is minimal.
Since most of the architecture port code and configurations will be
shared between the Cortex-A and Cortex-R architectures, it is
advantageous to have them together in the same directory.
Signed-off-by: Stephanos Ioannidis <root@stephanos.io>
Before introducing the code for ARM64 (AArch64) we need to relocate the
current ARM code to a new AArch32 sub-directory. For now we can assume
that no code is shared between ARM and ARM64.
There are no functional changes. The code is moved to the new location
and the file paths are fixed to reflect this change.
Signed-off-by: Carlo Caione <ccaione@baylibre.com>
There are two set of code supporting x86_64: x86_64 using x32 ABI,
and x86 long mode, and this consolidates both into one x86_64
architecture and SoC supporting truly 64-bit mode.
() Removes the x86_64:x32 architecture and SoC, and replaces
them with the existing x86 long mode arch and SoC.
() Replace qemu_x86_64 with qemu_x86_long as qemu_x86_64.
() Updates samples and tests to remove reference to
qemu_x86_long.
() Renames CONFIG_X86_LONGMODE to CONFIG_X86_64.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@intel.com>
With the upcoming riscv64 support, it is best to use "riscv" as the
subdirectory name and common symbols as riscv32 and riscv64 support
code is almost identical. Then later decide whether 32-bit or 64-bit
compilation is wanted.
Redirects for the web documentation are also included.
Then zephyrbot complained about this:
"
New files added that are not covered in CODEOWNERS:
dts/riscv/microsemi-miv.dtsi
dts/riscv/riscv32-fe310.dtsi
Please add one or more entries in the CODEOWNERS file to cover
those files
"
So I assigned them to those who created them. Feel free to readjust
as necessary.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <npitre@baylibre.com>
Found a few annoying typos and figured I better run script and
fix anything it can find, here are the results...
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
Move test related code and the testsuite away from tests/ and make it a
proper subsystem.
The way tests were integrate in the tree was not obvious and actual
tests were intermixed with the testsuite code.
This will allow us to have trees with the testcode and without the
samples by just remove the folders tests/ and samples, needed for
isolating actual code from test/sample code.
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
