As of today <zephyr/zephyr.h> is 100% equivalent to <zephyr/kernel.h>.
This patch proposes to then include <zephyr/kernel.h> instead of
<zephyr/zephyr.h> since it is more clear that you are including the
Kernel APIs and (probably) nothing else. <zephyr/zephyr.h> sounds like a
catch-all header that may be confusing. Most applications need to
include a bunch of other things to compile, e.g. driver headers or
subsystem headers like BT, logging, etc.
The idea of a catch-all header in Zephyr is probably not feasible
anyway. Reason is that Zephyr is not a library, like it could be for
example `libpython`. Zephyr provides many utilities nowadays: a kernel,
drivers, subsystems, etc and things will likely grow. A catch-all header
would be massive, difficult to keep up-to-date. It is also likely that
an application will only build a small subset. Note that subsystem-level
headers may use a catch-all approach to make things easier, though.
NOTE: This patch is **NOT** removing the header, just removing its usage
in-tree. I'd advocate for its deprecation (add a #warning on it), but I
understand many people will have concerns.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
SoF pins threads to specific cores and don't need them to be executed in
multiple cores. This options allows Zephyr to do cache optimizations
during context switches.
Signed-off-by: Flavio Ceolin <flavio.ceolin@intel.com>
Enable Zephyr device runtime power management mechanisms in Intel SSP
driver. This allows Zephyr to track usage reference for power
domain gating.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Frydryk <krzysztofx.frydryk@intel.com>
This is not a sample of an audio subsystem in zephyr, it is a sample
that completely depends on sof and its audio support.
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
