There are issues using lowercase min and max macros when compiling a C++
application with a third-party toolchain such as GNU ARM Embedded when
using some STL headers i.e. <chrono>.
This is because there are actual C++ functions called min and max
defined in some of the STL headers and these macros interfere with them.
By changing the macros to UPPERCASE, which is consistent with almost all
other pre-processor macros this naming conflict is avoided.
All files that use these macros have been updated.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Stuart <carlosstuart1970@gmail.com>
benchmark/app_kernel test was giving a float exception
if the operations were performed faster than the
system timer resolution.
Added a safety macro in all divisions to avoid the fault
Signed-off-by: Alberto Escolar Piedras <alpi@oticon.com>
Test whichever had Camel case defined for functions and variables have
been replaced.
Following warnings have been fixed in test cases as well.
- line over 80 characters
- Macros with flow control statements should be avoided
- Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
- break quoted strings at a space character
- do not add new typedefs
- Comparisons should place the constant on the right
side of the test
- suspect code indent for conditional statements
- Missing a blank line after declarations
- macros should not use a trailing semicolon
- Macros with multiple statements should be
enclosed in a do - while loop
- do not use C99 // comments
JIRA: ZEP-2249
Signed-off-by: Punit Vara <punit.vara@intel.com>
Convert code to use u{8,16,32,64}_t and s{8,16,32,64}_t instead of C99
integer types.
Jira: ZEP-2051
Change-Id: I6c676bc6c5e850a8725785554cd535e32067f33e
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@linaro.org>
Deleted the instance of app_kernel in tests/legacy/benchmark.
JIRA: ZEP-1980
Change-Id: I5a6e073d9b0c870be0cc7d8ae5bb352b11d7f97e
Signed-off-by: Adithya Baglody <adithya.nagaraj.baglody@intel.com>
