Sphinx>=3.0 includes the `struct` role in the C domain, which provides a
specific way to link to structs, while the old :c:type: role should be
primary used to typedefs. Update existing references, using :c:type:,
:cpp:type: or emphasized symbols that point to structs to use the new
role.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Utzig <fabio.utzig@nordicsemi.no>
Following the change to use the C domain for parsing, update all
existing :cpp:func: references to :c:func:. Remove the parentheses as
well, if used, because they are not needed, this is already known to be
a function, and how it is displayed in the documentation later is a
semantic decision done by the output builder.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Utzig <fabio.utzig@nordicsemi.no>
Fixing issues with recent versions of breathe 4.19.2:
WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'struct device'
Invalid C declaration: Expected identifier in nested name, got keyword:
struct [error at 6]
struct device
------^
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
Before introducing the code for ARM64 (AArch64) we need to relocate the
current ARM code to a new AArch32 sub-directory. For now we can assume
that no code is shared between ARM and ARM64.
There are no functional changes. The code is moved to the new location
and the file paths are fixed to reflect this change.
Signed-off-by: Carlo Caione <ccaione@baylibre.com>
One shows how globals are routed for automatic memory
domains. The other illustrates control flow when making
system calls.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Boie <andrew.p.boie@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David B. Kinder <david.b.kinder@intel.com>
This commit allows a more dynamic approach for specifying that a zephyr
library must be placed in a dedicated app memomory partition.
This is still done by defining the partition in code using
K_APPMEM_PARTITION_DEFINE, but now the zephyr library can be added to
the generation of partition table using zephyr_library_app_memory
instead of modifying the overall zephyr/CMakeLists.txt file.
Signed-off-by: Torsten Rasmussen <Torsten.Rasmussen@nordicsemi.no>
We now more throroughly discuss memory domains, thread
resource pools, and automatic memory domains.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Boie <andrew.p.boie@intel.com>
