Add `yd_esp32` board:
- Model name: YD-ESP32
- Manufacturer: VCC-GND® Studio
- Espressif module: ESP32-WROOM-32E
Signed-off-by: Julio Cesar <hi@jcsx.dev>
Remove virtual esp32 board and replace it with the
real word boards:
- esp32_devkitc_wroom
- esp32_devkitc_wrover (with PSRAM option)
Signed-off-by: Marek Matej <marek.matej@espressif.com>
Twister now supports using YAML lists for all fields that were written
as space-separated lists. Used twister_to_list.py script. Some artifacts
on string length are due to how ruamel dumps content.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
As both C and C++ standards require applications running under an OS to
return 'int', adapt that for Zephyr to align with those standard. This also
eliminates errors when building with clang when not using -ffreestanding,
and reduces the need for compiler flags to silence warnings for both clang
and gcc.
Most of these changes were automated using coccinelle with the following
script:
@@
@@
- void
+ int
main(...) {
...
- return;
+ return 0;
...
}
Approximately 40 files had to be edited by hand as coccinelle was unable to
fix them.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Current ipm_esp32 sample code requires esp32_net_firmware.c file
as source input, which is generated after ipm_esp32_net build.
esp32_net_firmware.c was manually added as binary blob, which needs to
be removed from the repository.
This change modifies ipm_esp32 CMakeLists.txt to include the build
output of ipm_esp32_net as input source of ipm_esp32 build, allowing the
binary blob to be removed.
Current approach shall be updated during next release.
Signed-off-by: Sylvio Alves <sylvio.alves@espressif.com>
Now that IPM drivers are enabled based on devicetree we can
remove any cases of them getting enabled by Kconfig, *defconfig*,
and *.conf files.
We need to remove any cases of them getting enabled by
Kconfig.defconfig* files as this can lead to errors.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@intel.com>
As of today <zephyr/zephyr.h> is 100% equivalent to <zephyr/kernel.h>.
This patch proposes to then include <zephyr/kernel.h> instead of
<zephyr/zephyr.h> since it is more clear that you are including the
Kernel APIs and (probably) nothing else. <zephyr/zephyr.h> sounds like a
catch-all header that may be confusing. Most applications need to
include a bunch of other things to compile, e.g. driver headers or
subsystem headers like BT, logging, etc.
The idea of a catch-all header in Zephyr is probably not feasible
anyway. Reason is that Zephyr is not a library, like it could be for
example `libpython`. Zephyr provides many utilities nowadays: a kernel,
drivers, subsystems, etc and things will likely grow. A catch-all header
would be massive, difficult to keep up-to-date. It is also likely that
an application will only build a small subset. Note that subsystem-level
headers may use a catch-all approach to make things easier, though.
NOTE: This patch is **NOT** removing the header, just removing its usage
in-tree. I'd advocate for its deprecation (add a #warning on it), but I
understand many people will have concerns.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
code to demonstrate the utilization of assymetric
dual core infrastructure based on soft-IPM implementation.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Neves <felipe.neves@linaro.org>
