The spin loop to ensure time goes past the timeout is done in terms
of the core clock, while the spin lock is timed on the system clock.
This difference is exasperated on systems where the core clock is much
faster than the system clock and the test failed. Add a significant
multiplier so the test works even when the system clock is much slower.
Signed-off-by: Tom Burdick <thomas.burdick@intel.com>
Spin locks must be in coherent memory for cavs. Initially this variable
was at the compilation unit scope but warnings about it being unused
from a twister run lead me to move it to be in the ifdef scope in the
function.
Move it back into the compilation units scope and wrap it in an
ifdef to ensure its not labeled as unused.
Signed-off-by: Tom Burdick <thomas.burdick@intel.com>
Set the time limit to be long enough not to trigger too early. Do
not unlock after assert when doing the time limit test.
Signed-off-by: Tom Burdick <thomas.burdick@intel.com>
Spin locks held for any lengthy duration prevent interrupts and
in a real time system where interrupts drive tasks this can be
problematic. Add an option to assert if a spin lock is held for
a duration longer than the configurable number of microseconds.
Signed-off-by: Tom Burdick <thomas.burdick@intel.com>
As of today <zephyr/zephyr.h> is 100% equivalent to <zephyr/kernel.h>.
This patch proposes to then include <zephyr/kernel.h> instead of
<zephyr/zephyr.h> since it is more clear that you are including the
Kernel APIs and (probably) nothing else. <zephyr/zephyr.h> sounds like a
catch-all header that may be confusing. Most applications need to
include a bunch of other things to compile, e.g. driver headers or
subsystem headers like BT, logging, etc.
The idea of a catch-all header in Zephyr is probably not feasible
anyway. Reason is that Zephyr is not a library, like it could be for
example `libpython`. Zephyr provides many utilities nowadays: a kernel,
drivers, subsystems, etc and things will likely grow. A catch-all header
would be massive, difficult to keep up-to-date. It is also likely that
an application will only build a small subset. Note that subsystem-level
headers may use a catch-all approach to make things easier, though.
NOTE: This patch is **NOT** removing the header, just removing its usage
in-tree. I'd advocate for its deprecation (add a #warning on it), but I
understand many people will have concerns.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Add a bunch of missing "zephyr/" prefixes to #include statements in
various test and test framework files.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabiobaltieri@google.com>
In order to bring consistency in-tree, migrate all tests to the new
prefix <zephyr/...>. Note that the conversion has been scripted, refer
to #45388 for more details.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
This functions is being called across the tree, no reason why it should
not be a public API.
The current usage violates a few MISRA rules.
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
Add some error test cases for spinlock, include:
1.Validate indentical spinlock cannot be used recursively.
2.Validate unlocking incorrect spinlock will trigger assertion.
3.Validate releasing incorrect spinlock will trigger assertion.
Signed-off-by: Enjia Mai <enjiax.mai@intel.com>
