Add const prefix for service uuid and char uuid.
Since Service UUID and Char UUID should not change in the service
definition, they are most reasonably defined as rodata, also for
save some ram footprint.
The field `attr->user_data` type is `void *`, as this PR change
all Service UUID to rodata, so there must add (void *) to avoid warning.
Signed-off-by: Lingao Meng <menglingao@xiaomi.com>
As both C and C++ standards require applications running under an OS to
return 'int', adapt that for Zephyr to align with those standard. This also
eliminates errors when building with clang when not using -ffreestanding,
and reduces the need for compiler flags to silence warnings for both clang
and gcc.
Most of these changes were automated using coccinelle with the following
script:
@@
@@
- void
+ int
main(...) {
...
- return;
+ return 0;
...
}
Approximately 40 files had to be edited by hand as coccinelle was unable to
fix them.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
The controlling expression of an if statement
and the controlling expression of an iteration-statement shall have
essentially Boolean type.
Signed-off-by: Pirun Lee <pirun.lee@nordicsemi.no>
Peripheral: Fix wrong objects index
Central: Fix client not working after re-connect.
Check object properties before read/write.
Signed-off-by: Pirun Lee <pirun.lee@nordicsemi.no>
As of today <zephyr/zephyr.h> is 100% equivalent to <zephyr/kernel.h>.
This patch proposes to then include <zephyr/kernel.h> instead of
<zephyr/zephyr.h> since it is more clear that you are including the
Kernel APIs and (probably) nothing else. <zephyr/zephyr.h> sounds like a
catch-all header that may be confusing. Most applications need to
include a bunch of other things to compile, e.g. driver headers or
subsystem headers like BT, logging, etc.
The idea of a catch-all header in Zephyr is probably not feasible
anyway. Reason is that Zephyr is not a library, like it could be for
example `libpython`. Zephyr provides many utilities nowadays: a kernel,
drivers, subsystems, etc and things will likely grow. A catch-all header
would be massive, difficult to keep up-to-date. It is also likely that
an application will only build a small subset. Note that subsystem-level
headers may use a catch-all approach to make things easier, though.
NOTE: This patch is **NOT** removing the header, just removing its usage
in-tree. I'd advocate for its deprecation (add a #warning on it), but I
understand many people will have concerns.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
