As of today <zephyr/zephyr.h> is 100% equivalent to <zephyr/kernel.h>.
This patch proposes to then include <zephyr/kernel.h> instead of
<zephyr/zephyr.h> since it is more clear that you are including the
Kernel APIs and (probably) nothing else. <zephyr/zephyr.h> sounds like a
catch-all header that may be confusing. Most applications need to
include a bunch of other things to compile, e.g. driver headers or
subsystem headers like BT, logging, etc.
The idea of a catch-all header in Zephyr is probably not feasible
anyway. Reason is that Zephyr is not a library, like it could be for
example `libpython`. Zephyr provides many utilities nowadays: a kernel,
drivers, subsystems, etc and things will likely grow. A catch-all header
would be massive, difficult to keep up-to-date. It is also likely that
an application will only build a small subset. Note that subsystem-level
headers may use a catch-all approach to make things easier, though.
NOTE: This patch is **NOT** removing the header, just removing its usage
in-tree. I'd advocate for its deprecation (add a #warning on it), but I
understand many people will have concerns.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
In order to bring consistency in-tree, migrate all samples to the use
the new prefix <zephyr/...>. Note that the conversion has been scripted:
```python
from pathlib import Path
import re
EXTENSIONS = ("c", "h", "cpp", "rst")
for p in Path(".").glob("samples/**/*"):
if not p.is_file() or p.suffix and p.suffix[1:] not in EXTENSIONS:
continue
content = ""
with open(p) as f:
for line in f:
m = re.match(r"^(.*)#include <(.*)>(.*)$", line)
if (m and
not m.group(2).startswith("zephyr/") and
(Path(".") / "include" / "zephyr" / m.group(2)).exists()):
content += (
m.group(1) +
"#include <zephyr/" + m.group(2) +">" +
m.group(3) + "\n"
)
else:
content += line
with open(p, "w") as f:
f.write(content)
```
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
This patch brings simple example on per DSA port LLDP filtering based on
MAC address of received packet.
Each lan1, lan2 and lan3 ports handle separately LLDP packets going into
them.
Nonetheless, the K66F ENET handles correctly all other packets types -
to be more specific - ICMP, TCP/IP.
Setup -> ON HOST:
Configure/start the lldpd daemon (debian 10) on host to use
MAC 01:80:c2:00:00:03:
(lldpd -ddd & ) && sleep 2 && \
lldpcli configure lldp agent-type nearest-non-tpmr-bridge
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
