The new spinlock validation features combined with spinlockification
have increased stack usage a bit in CONFIG_ASSERT builds, but this is
a good feature we want to keep. This test was bumping into limits, so
increase the size from 512 to 640 bytes.
Unfortunately, this is also a huge test that creates a LOT of those
stacks across different test cases, so that minor bump blows us past
the 64k SRAM limit on a bunch of boards. So unify all those stacks
that are only ever used in one case at a time so the memory can be
shared. Now there's one fixed stack, named "tstack", and one array
"tstacks". Much smaller.
Signed-off-by: Andy Ross <andrew.j.ross@intel.com>
These tests need to use stack size as a function of
CONFIG_TEST_EXTRA_STACKSIZE. These test will fail when
CONFIG_COVERAGE is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Adithya Baglody <adithya.nagaraj.baglody@intel.com>
There is actually nothing wrong with this test code idiom. But it's
tickling a qemu emulator bug with the hpet driver and x86_64[1]. The
rapidly spinning calls to k_uptime_get_32() need to disable
interrupts, read timer hardware state and enable them. Something goes
wrong in qemu with this process and the timer interrupt gets lost.
The counter blows right past the comparator without delivering its
interrupt, and thus the interrupt won't be delivered until the counter
is next reset in idle after exit from the busy loop, which is
obviously too late to interrupt the timeslicing thread.
Just replace the loops with a single call to k_busy_wait(). The
resulting code ends up being much simpler anyway. An added bonus is
that we can remove the special case handling for native_posix (which
was an entirely unrelated thing, but with a similar symptom).
[1] But oddly not the same emulated hardware running with the same
driver under the same qemu binary when used with a 32 bit kernel.
Signed-off-by: Andy Ross <andrew.j.ross@intel.com>
In the POSIX architecture, with the inf_clock "SOC", time does
not pass while the CPU is running. Tests that require time to pass
while busy waiting should call k_busy_wait() or in some other way
set the CPU to idle. This test was setting the CPU to idle while
waiting for the next time slice. This is ok if the system tick
(timer) is active and awaking the CPU every system tick period.
But when configured in tickless mode that is not the case, and the
CPU was set to sleep for an indefinite amount of time.
This commit fixes it by using k_busy_wait(a few microseconds) inside
that busy wait loop instead.
Signed-off-by: Alberto Escolar Piedras <alpi@oticon.com>
In the POSIX architecture, with the inf_clock "SOC", time does
not pass while the CPU is running. Tests that require time to pass
while busy waiting should call k_busy_wait() or in some other way
set the CPU to idle. This test was setting the CPU to idle while
waiting for the next time slice. This is ok if the system tick
(timer) is active and awaking the CPU every system tick period.
But when configured in tickless mode that is not the case, and the
CPU was set to sleep for an indefinite amount of time.
This commit fixes it by using k_busy_wait(a few microseconds) inside
that busy wait loop instead.
Signed-off-by: Alberto Escolar Piedras <alpi@oticon.com>
The stack size was way too less. Increasing the size to minimum
of 512 for all platforms.
Signed-off-by: Adithya Baglody <adithya.nagaraj.baglody@intel.com>
This commit replaces exact time compassion by a range check, allowing
the tests to pass on platforms which needs rounding in __ticks_to_ms()
and _ms_to_ticks().
Signed-off-by: Piotr Zięcik <piotr.ziecik@nordicsemi.no>
When adding the nRF52810, which has 24KB of RAM, some of the tests don't
compile anymore due to lack of SRAM. Address this by either filtering
the test out or reducing the amount of memory allocation.
Signed-off-by: Carles Cufi <carles.cufi@nordicsemi.no>
Because the address and size alignment of MPUv2,
limite the thread numbers for emsk_em7d_v22.
If not, build will faill because of DCCM overflow
Signed-off-by: Wayne Ren <wei.ren@synopsys.com>
