update test case with sys_clock_hw_cycles_per_sec() api to retrieve
system clock frequency (HW cycle per sec) at runtime or statically
Signed-off-by: Najumon B.A <najumon.ba@intel.com>
The init infrastructure, found in `init.h`, is currently used by:
- `SYS_INIT`: to call functions before `main`
- `DEVICE_*`: to initialize devices
They are all sorted according to an initialization level + a priority.
`SYS_INIT` calls are really orthogonal to devices, however, the required
function signature requires a `const struct device *dev` as a first
argument. The only reason for that is because the same init machinery is
used by devices, so we have something like:
```c
struct init_entry {
int (*init)(const struct device *dev);
/* only set by DEVICE_*, otherwise NULL */
const struct device *dev;
}
```
As a result, we end up with such weird/ugly pattern:
```c
static int my_init(const struct device *dev)
{
/* always NULL! add ARG_UNUSED to avoid compiler warning */
ARG_UNUSED(dev);
...
}
```
This is really a result of poor internals isolation. This patch proposes
a to make init entries more flexible so that they can accept sytem
initialization calls like this:
```c
static int my_init(void)
{
...
}
```
This is achieved using a union:
```c
union init_function {
/* for SYS_INIT, used when init_entry.dev == NULL */
int (*sys)(void);
/* for DEVICE*, used when init_entry.dev != NULL */
int (*dev)(const struct device *dev);
};
struct init_entry {
/* stores init function (either for SYS_INIT or DEVICE*)
union init_function init_fn;
/* stores device pointer for DEVICE*, NULL for SYS_INIT. Allows
* to know which union entry to call.
*/
const struct device *dev;
}
```
This solution **does not increase ROM usage**, and allows to offer clean
public APIs for both SYS_INIT and DEVICE*. Note that however, init
machinery keeps a coupling with devices.
**NOTE**: This is a breaking change! All `SYS_INIT` functions will need
to be converted to the new signature. See the script offered in the
following commit.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
init: convert SYS_INIT functions to the new signature
Conversion scripted using scripts/utils/migrate_sys_init.py.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
manifest: update projects for SYS_INIT changes
Update modules with updated SYS_INIT calls:
- hal_ti
- lvgl
- sof
- TraceRecorderSource
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
tests: devicetree: devices: adjust test
Adjust test according to the recently introduced SYS_INIT
infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
tests: kernel: threads: adjust SYS_INIT call
Adjust to the new signature: int (*init_fn)(void);
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
The _SYS_INIT_LEVEL* definitions were used to indicate the index entry
into the levels array defined in init.c (z_sys_init_run_level). init.c
uses this information internally, so there is no point in exposing this
in a public header. It has been replaced with an enum inside init.c. The
device shell was re-using the same defines to index its own array. This
is a fragile design, the shell needs to be responsible of its own data
indexing. A similar situation happened with some unit tests.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
We have cases where some devices needs to be initialized very early and
before c_start is call, i.e. to setup very early console or to setup
memory. Traditionally this would be hardcoded as part of the soc layer
and not using device model or the init levels.
This patch adds a new level ARCH, which will be called in early
architecture code and before we jump to the kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
As of today <zephyr/zephyr.h> is 100% equivalent to <zephyr/kernel.h>.
This patch proposes to then include <zephyr/kernel.h> instead of
<zephyr/zephyr.h> since it is more clear that you are including the
Kernel APIs and (probably) nothing else. <zephyr/zephyr.h> sounds like a
catch-all header that may be confusing. Most applications need to
include a bunch of other things to compile, e.g. driver headers or
subsystem headers like BT, logging, etc.
The idea of a catch-all header in Zephyr is probably not feasible
anyway. Reason is that Zephyr is not a library, like it could be for
example `libpython`. Zephyr provides many utilities nowadays: a kernel,
drivers, subsystems, etc and things will likely grow. A catch-all header
would be massive, difficult to keep up-to-date. It is also likely that
an application will only build a small subset. Note that subsystem-level
headers may use a catch-all approach to make things easier, though.
NOTE: This patch is **NOT** removing the header, just removing its usage
in-tree. I'd advocate for its deprecation (add a #warning on it), but I
understand many people will have concerns.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Add a bunch of missing "zephyr/" prefixes to #include statements in
various test and test framework files.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabiobaltieri@google.com>
In order to bring consistency in-tree, migrate all tests to the new
prefix <zephyr/...>. Note that the conversion has been scripted, refer
to #45388 for more details.
Signed-off-by: Gerard Marull-Paretas <gerard.marull@nordicsemi.no>
Extended test to validate following functionality:
- k_busy_wait
- k_timer
- irq_lock/irq_unlock
- k_cpu_idle
- SYS_INIT()
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Chruscinski <krzysztof.chruscinski@nordicsemi.no>
The comment in this test says that it cannot use ztest, as the latter
spawns some threads. However, still format the output in a way
compatible with ztest output, by using tc_util.h macros. This is
similar to a few other tests which can't use ztest library directly.
Signed-off-by: Paul Sokolovsky <paul.sokolovsky@linaro.org>
We are reporting success twice, once by calling macro directly, and once
by using ztest test_main().
Signed-off-by: Anas Nashif <anas.nashif@intel.com>
This is a feature Ben added so you could use Zephyr's arch layer to
bootstrap things like bootloaders without sucking in the whole kernel.
And it's worked until now.
But we never had a test for it, and I just broke it with the scheduler
rework. Add a trivial test just to make sure this continues to link
and run. Longer term it would be nice to have some kind of size
metric here to guarantee that the feature stays lean and doesn't pull
in needless code.
Signed-off-by: Andy Ross <andrew.j.ross@intel.com>
